Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-29914576-20180608135741/@comment-32973614-20180804114203

LemonCakeDude wrote: Red anvil wrote: To make a good tierlist that considers the units in an average situation, more than DPS we would need cost efficiency, survivability, range, a "value" that indicates how valuable that unit's ability is etc.

Of course, considering all that stuff is pretty much impossible, tho.

Also, i am not used to tiers, so sorry if this may sound like a stupid question, but wouldn't it make more sense to have a rank between 1 and 100 or something like that instead of letters? Also why that S? Here is the 7.2 Updated Tierlist by people who know what they are doing: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1b8mLHCa0cgPRggCc-bJQT5mRYsr2cIko0Lf7l0G6ewk/edit... Read the methodology to see the way they decided on to rank the Ubers, it isn't near as simple as dps... A list using numbers 1-100 would be huge and way harder to decide on with multiple people working on it... S is decently common in anything with a letter ranking system, to go above A or A+ and just add more S's(weird grammar but idk..) to make something higher than S.. I haven't heard of G before but thats interesting.. This is just nothing more but someone else's opinion.